WHO Poll
Q: 2023/24 Hopes & aspirations for this season
a. As Champions of Europe there's no reason we shouldn't be pushing for a top 7 spot & a run in the Cups
24%
  
b. Last season was a trophy winning one and there's only one way to go after that, I expect a dull mid table bore fest of a season
17%
  
c. Buy some f***ing players or we're in a battle to stay up & that's as good as it gets
18%
  
d. Moyes out
38%
  
e. New season you say, woohoo time to get the new kit and wear it it to the pub for all the big games, the wags down there call me Mr West Ham
3%
  



WHUDeano 12:02 Fri Mar 16
West Ham board fight back by encouraging spread of 'fake news' in national media!
Hugh Southon can fanny with his pro-board headlines, here's WHO's....

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/43424575

"Analysis

BBC Sport's Simon Stone

It is only now that the sheer scale and organisation of Saturday's trouble is becoming apparent.

Rather than the spontaneous uprising against the club's owners it initially appeared to be, it has now been established hundreds of supporters were involved, communicating with mobile phones, and creating small-scale problems, in a concerted effort to get security staff away from their designated areas to leave the directors' box, in particular, vulnerable.

Sixty staff are employed at London Stadium on matchdays with the specific brief to keep fans off the pitch. It has been established that on Saturday, 85% of those attempts were repelled."

hahaha! If only Morgan & Swallow knew about our level of organisation they would have rejected the bung from the start!

Replies - In Chronological Order (Show Newest Messages First)

Johnson 12:08 Fri Mar 16
Re: West Ham board fight back by encouraging spread of 'fake news' in national media!
Classic them and us propaganda method.

Make out those protesting are determined and organised troublemakers only there to cause trouble and not life long fans gutted by what those lying, thieving scum cunts have done.

Need to up the protest levels on the 31st. Show them what we can do when organised.

SDKFZ 222 12:19 Fri Mar 16
Re: West Ham board fight back by encouraging spread of 'fake news' in national media!
‘Communicating with mobile phones!’

How on Earth? Mine never works when I am inside the stadium!

Kite 12:22 Fri Mar 16
Re: West Ham board fight back by encouraging spread of 'fake news' in national media!
Look at the release timeline of these stories, new safety measures, new player for 53m, 100 people and their mobiles, it’s fucking bull shit, lies.

They are trying to stage manage all this fake news to try and gain some credit in the press.

fucking hell they are disparate.

VirginiaHam 12:22 Fri Mar 16
Re: West Ham board fight back by encouraging spread of 'fake news' in national media!
Which mobile operators can't provide service at the shithole? Can we get a list so we can respond?

BRANDED 12:25 Fri Mar 16
Re: West Ham board fight back by encouraging spread of 'fake news' in national media!
Spasticated

Mike Oxsaw 12:33 Fri Mar 16
Re: West Ham board fight back by encouraging spread of 'fake news' in national media!
VirginiaHam 12:22 Fri Mar 16

The construction of the stadium makes it a radio blind spot for mobiles (including the police TETRA system).

They had to install a special system to allow radio communications inside the bowl while the Olympics were on and there was quite a few posts (on here, even) about what would happen once it was removed (not replaced, obviously).

You can't spin the laws of physics (they have their own).

Bluetooth could have been used inside the stadium, but that requires a lot of prior configuration and fiddling with accepting connections afterwards.

"Beard" is the correct call here.

Willtell 12:34 Fri Mar 16
Re: West Ham board fight back by encouraging spread of 'fake news' in national media!
Sullivan making up stories and drip feeding them to the media......nah impossible!!

VirginiaHam 12:39 Fri Mar 16
Re: West Ham board fight back by encouraging spread of 'fake news' in national media!
Mike Oxsaw 12:33 Fri Mar 16

I remember that Police issue. I used Vodaphone when I was at he shithole but can't remember if it worked or not.

Mike Oxsaw 12:45 Fri Mar 16
Re: West Ham board fight back by encouraging spread of 'fake news' in national media!
VirginiaHam 12:39 Fri Mar 16

It looks like as it is still an "issue" as it seems the police stay outside the stadium until/unless called in (because they're out of contact with their bosses when inside).

THAT's how concerned the club are about security & safety.

WHUDeano 12:53 Fri Mar 16
Re: West Ham board fight back by encouraging spread of 'fake news' in national media!
Would love to see proof of how the pitch invaders texted each other before entering the field of play. The fact that this is in the BBC and not one of the standard tabloids is quite unbelievable.

, 12:56 Fri Mar 16
Re: West Ham board fight back by encouraging spread of 'fake news' in national media!
Just to be specific this "news" came from the Safety Advisory Group" [ SAG ].

SAG comprises representatives from the club, police, Newham council, and stadium owners and operators.

So how can all these groups other than the club go along with this contention of supporters using their mobiles inside the stadium?

Takashi Miike 12:56 Fri Mar 16
Re: West Ham board fight back by encouraging spread of 'fake news' in national media!
whetstone was on TS last night , and yes he is rather wet

Johnson 12:57 Fri Mar 16
Re: West Ham board fight back by encouraging spread of 'fake news' in national media!
Where does it say it came from the SAG, comma?

I’m not arsed feasting the link

Johnson 12:57 Fri Mar 16
Re: West Ham board fight back by encouraging spread of 'fake news' in national media!
Feasting?

Reading. Cunt phone.

, 12:59 Fri Mar 16
Re: West Ham board fight back by encouraging spread of 'fake news' in national media!
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/43424575

Johnson 1:07 Fri Mar 16
Re: West Ham board fight back by encouraging spread of 'fake news' in national media!
Right, so I read the link.

Seems the only reference to organised pitch invasion is via the analysis tapped on the end by a journo presumably keen for a feel of Brady’s tits.

So I ask again, where did the SAB say this was organised pitch invasions?

El Scorchio 1:25 Fri Mar 16
Re: West Ham board fight back by encouraging spread of 'fake news' in national media!
I can’t believe that story to be anything other than total bullshit unless I see some pretty strong evidence to the contrary.

Johnson 1:33 Fri Mar 16
Re: West Ham board fight back by encouraging spread of 'fake news' in national media!
The SAB has it apparently, comma said so.

chedylan 2 12:03 Fri Mar 16
Re: West Ham board fight back by encouraging spread of 'fake news' in national media!
The cunts will never get it.

They were desperate to suppress the march, and got their way my hoodwinking RWF.

Didn't work tho did it cunts. Fans frustrations boiled over in front of your faces instead.

Like the Soviets the dwarf wierdo dresses as. He hasn't anything from how that ended up.

percyd 12:44 Fri Mar 16
Re: West Ham board fight back by encouraging spread of 'fake news' in national media!
"It has been established that on Saturday, 85% of those attempts were repelled."

So, if 85% were "repelled" and - what was it - 3 or 4 made it onto the pitch then this cellular conspiracy amounted to around 20-25 individuals who actually attempted to get onto the pitch. Hardly an invasion is it?

Page 1 - Next




Copyright 2006 WHO.NET | Powered by: